MARILYN MANSON'S SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE BY FORMER ASSISTANT REINSTATED UNDER NEW CALIFORNIA LAW. (PHOTO)

Image
Marilyn Manson's sexual assault case by former assistant reinstated under new California law A previously dismissed sexual assault case against Marilyn Manson, filed by former assistant Ashley Walters, was revived Monday in Los Angeles Superior Court under a new California law extending the statute of limitations for certain sexual abuse claims. Judge Steve Cochran granted Walters’ motion for reconsideration, vacating his December 2025 ruling that had dismissed the case and allowing it to proceed toward trial. The original suit, first filed in 2021, accused Manson, whose legal name is Brian Warner, of sexual harassment, sexual battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and wrongful termination based on her time working for him in 2010–2011. Previous attempts to move the case forward were blocked because the claims were made years after the alleged incidents, with courts initially ruling that the delayed discovery doctrine did not apply. The new law, Assembly Bill 250, s...

JUDGE REVIEWS GOOGLE'S REQUEST TO DISMISS STUDENT DATA TRACKING LAWSUIT. (PHOTO).


 Judge reviews Google's request to dismiss student data tracking lawsuit

A federal judge heard arguments Thursday over a motion by Google to dismiss a class-action lawsuit accusing the tech giant of collecting and monitoring K-12 student data without parental consent.

The suit, filed by the parents of four children, targets Google’s Chromebooks, Chrome browser, and its Google Workspace for Education suite, which includes apps such as Google Classroom, Gmail, and Google Drive. Attorneys for the plaintiffs said the company gathers extensive metadata from every interaction with these products, including device details, network settings, and app usage.

The lawsuit, filed in April in federal court in San Francisco, alleges Google exposed children to “serious and irreversible risks” by harvesting personal information in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, and California privacy law. U.S. District Chief Judge Richard Seeborg questioned both sides about Google’s role in schools, probing whether the company acts solely as a service provider or exercises broader control over student data.

Google’s attorney argued the complaint was too vague and procedurally deficient, noting it did not specify which schools or products were used or what data was collected. Plaintiffs’ attorney countered that the widespread use of Google products and the “gross asymmetry of information” prevent parents from knowing exactly what data is gathered, but confirmed the children were enrolled in schools using Google services.

The lawsuit argues that modern education technology has shifted control of student data away from parents, allowing Google to use it for commercial purposes. Parents are effectively compelled to consent because students must use the products in school, according to the plaintiffs. Google, citing federal guidance, maintains that consent from schools satisfies the requirements of COPPA.

Plaintiffs contend that Google’s practices undermine parental rights and privacy, with attorney Julie Liddell asserting that the surveillance of children—both at school and at home—presents a constitutional concern. Google provided privacy statements and terms of service as part of its defense, noting that more than 50 million students use Chromebooks and 170 million use Google Workspace for Education.

The court has yet to rule on whether the case will proceed.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SHAKIRA COVERS WOMEN'S HEALTH MAGAZINE,APRIL ISSUE.

INNOSON GIVES OUT BRAND NEW IVM G5 AND SALARY FOR LIFE TO THE MAN WHO PROPHESIED ABOUT HIS VEHICLE MANUFACTURING IN 1979.(PHOTO).

TINUBU ANNOUNCES ARRIVAL OF 4 U.S ATTACK HELICOPTERS. (PHOTO).