MALIAN ARMY WITHDRAWS FROM KEY TESSALIT MILITARY CAMP. (PHOTO).

Image
 Malian army withdraws from key Tessalit military camp: sources Mali’s army and its Russian mercenary allies have surrendered Camp Tessalit, a strategic military post in the north, multiple sources told the AFP news agency on Friday. An official from the Tuareg-led separatist group claimed soldiers and mercenaries at the camp had "surrendered", following a fierce fight over the weekend. Simultaneous attacks in Mali by militants linked to Al Qaeda and separatist Tuareg rebels on April 25 showed how fighters ​from different groups with different goals were able to strike at the heart of the West African country's military government. Gunfire and explosions were reported in the capital Bamako and around a large military base outside the capital, as well as Gao and central areas, as gunfire continuing in the northern city of Kidal. Defence minister Sadio Camara was killed at his residence in Kati, a garrison town near the capital, Bamako, following the fierce weekend fighting...

BOEING AND HONEYWELL SUED BY FAMILIES OF AIR INDIA CRASH VICTIMS. (PHOTO).


 Boeing and Honeywell sued by families of Air India crash victims

The families of four passengers who died in the June crash of Air India Flight 171 have filed a lawsuit against Boeing and Honeywell, alleging negligence and a faulty fuel cutoff switch contributed to the accident that killed 260 people.

Flight 171 went down shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad en route to London on June 12. In a complaint filed Tuesday in Delaware Superior Court, the plaintiffs claim the locking mechanism for the switch on the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner could disengage or be missing, potentially cutting off fuel supply and causing loss of thrust during takeoff. The suit alleges Boeing and Honeywell, which installed and manufactured the switch, were aware of the risk, particularly after the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration issued a warning in 2018 about disengaged locking mechanisms on several Boeing aircraft.

The complaint states that placing the switch directly behind the thrust levers meant “normal cockpit activity could result in inadvertent fuel cutoff,” and that the companies failed to take steps to prevent what the plaintiffs call an “inevitable catastrophe.” Boeing, based in Arlington, Virginia, declined to comment, while Honeywell in Charlotte, North Carolina, did not respond immediately.

The lawsuit, believed to be the first in the U.S. related to the crash, seeks unspecified damages for the deaths of Kantaben Dhirubhai Paghadal, Naavya Chirag Paghadal, Kuberbhai Patel, and Babiben Patel. In total, 229 passengers, 12 crew members, and 19 people on the ground died; one passenger survived. The plaintiffs reside in India or the U.K.

Investigators from India, the U.K., and the U.S. have not conclusively determined the crash’s cause. A preliminary report from India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau in July described confusion in the cockpit before the accident. That same month, U.S. FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford expressed “a high level of confidence” that a mechanical failure or inadvertent fuel control movement was not responsible. Boeing previously faced over $20 billion in costs related to the 737 MAX crashes in 2018 and 2019, which grounded the aircraft for 20 months.

The case is Paghadal et al v Boeing Co et al, Delaware Superior Court, No. N25C-09-145.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SHAKIRA COVERS WOMEN'S HEALTH MAGAZINE,APRIL ISSUE.

THE NEW OONI OF ILE-IFE,WILL NOT EAT THE HEART OF THE LATE OONI-PALACE CHIEFS.

INNOSON GIVES OUT BRAND NEW IVM G5 AND SALARY FOR LIFE TO THE MAN WHO PROPHESIED ABOUT HIS VEHICLE MANUFACTURING IN 1979.(PHOTO).