UPDATE: KANDI BURRUSS BLASTS EX TODD TUCKER AFTER HE REVEALS THEY HAD THREESOMES THROUGHOUT ‘MOST OF’ 11-YEAR MARRIAGE. (PHOTO).

Image
 Kandi Burruss has hit back at her ex-husband Todd Tucker after the latter went public with intimate claims about their marriage. Now, the RHOA star says his latest move proves she was right to walk away. The former couple's private life is now playing out in public, with Burruss refusing to let Tucker's revelations go unanswered. Kandi Burruss responds to Todd Tucker's marriage revelations Tucker teased his upcoming movie 'Til Divorce Do Us Part with a trailer in which he opened up about their sex life. On the topic of threesomes, he confirmed the pair was involved in them. He even claimed the practice lasted through much of their 11-year marriage. "We did. I would say for most of our marriage we did," Tucker said. Now, Burruss fired back in a statement to People, the RHOA alum said, "A man who has already hurt me to my core is furthering the damage by choosing to sensationalize our sex life to stretch his five minutes of fame." Kandi Burruss furthe...

DIDDY FILES NEW APPEAL, CLAIMS JUDGE ACTED AS 'THIRTEENTH JUROR' WITH SEVERE SENTENCE. (PHOTO).


 Diddy files new appeal, claims judge acted as 'thirteenth juror' with severe sentence

Diddy’s legal team has filed a new appeal, sharply criticizing Judge Arun Subramanian for what they say was an overreach in handing down a 50-month prison sentence. The appeal, submitted late Tuesday, asks for Diddy’s conviction to be overturned or, at the very least, for his sentence to be reduced. The filing specifically accuses Subramanian of acting as a “thirteenth juror” rather than a neutral judge during the criminal trial.

Lead attorney Alexandra Shapiro argues in the documents that the judge imposed a “draconian” sentence based on conduct tied to racketeering and sex trafficking charges for which Diddy had been acquitted. Shapiro claims Subramanian improperly considered Diddy’s behavior related to the acquitted counts when determining the sentence, violating his constitutional rights. Diddy maintains his punishment should be limited to the two Mann Act convictions — transporting individuals for prostitution — for which he was found guilty. Previous appeals have also challenged whether Diddy even arranged the travel or payments tied to the alleged Mann Act violations. Federal prosecutors have a few months to respond before the case proceeds to the appellate court.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INNOSON GIVES OUT BRAND NEW IVM G5 AND SALARY FOR LIFE TO THE MAN WHO PROPHESIED ABOUT HIS VEHICLE MANUFACTURING IN 1979.(PHOTO).

MUSICIAN HARRY-SONG,REVEALS THE FACE OF THE FEMALE FAN WHO IS THREATENING TO KILL HIM.{PHOTOS}.

THE NEW OONI OF ILE-IFE,WILL NOT EAT THE HEART OF THE LATE OONI-PALACE CHIEFS.