UPDATE: KANDI BURRUSS BLASTS EX TODD TUCKER AFTER HE REVEALS THEY HAD THREESOMES THROUGHOUT ‘MOST OF’ 11-YEAR MARRIAGE. (PHOTO).

Image
 Kandi Burruss has hit back at her ex-husband Todd Tucker after the latter went public with intimate claims about their marriage. Now, the RHOA star says his latest move proves she was right to walk away. The former couple's private life is now playing out in public, with Burruss refusing to let Tucker's revelations go unanswered. Kandi Burruss responds to Todd Tucker's marriage revelations Tucker teased his upcoming movie 'Til Divorce Do Us Part with a trailer in which he opened up about their sex life. On the topic of threesomes, he confirmed the pair was involved in them. He even claimed the practice lasted through much of their 11-year marriage. "We did. I would say for most of our marriage we did," Tucker said. Now, Burruss fired back in a statement to People, the RHOA alum said, "A man who has already hurt me to my core is furthering the damage by choosing to sensationalize our sex life to stretch his five minutes of fame." Kandi Burruss furthe...

PROSECUTORS RESPOND AFTER DIDDY REQUESTS BAIL BEFORE SENTENCING. (PHOTO).


 Prosecutors respond after Diddy requests bail before sentencing

Federal prosecutors have strongly opposed Diddy's request for bail ahead of his sentencing, challenging his efforts to minimize his convictions related to transporting male escorts across state lines for paid sexual encounters involving his former girlfriends.

In court filings submitted Thursday, prosecutors argued that Diddy should remain in custody while awaiting sentencing after being convicted on two counts of violating the Mann Act. Although he was acquitted of the more serious racketeering and sex trafficking charges, prosecutors maintain his conduct warrants continued detention.

Diddy had filed a motion earlier, asking the judge to overturn his Mann Act convictions on the grounds that the law applies to transporting individuals for sex acts, which he denies having done himself. He claims he never engaged in sex with the escorts and only filmed his ex-girlfriends, Cassie and “Jane,” who arranged the encounters. Alternatively, he requested a new trial solely on the Mann Act counts.

Prosecutors fired back, stating that Diddy’s crimes include “aggravating — not mitigating — factors” that justify holding him. They highlight that he transported individuals for prostitution on numerous occasions over many years and allege he supplied Cassie and Jane with drugs to ensure their participation in prolonged sexual events, while subjecting them to violent behavior.

Opposing his $50 million bond request, the government emphasized Diddy’s history of violence and the risk he poses to the community. They also warned he is a flight risk, given the substantial prison time he faces.

Judge Arun Subramanian will have to carefully weigh these arguments as the case moves toward sentencing.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INNOSON GIVES OUT BRAND NEW IVM G5 AND SALARY FOR LIFE TO THE MAN WHO PROPHESIED ABOUT HIS VEHICLE MANUFACTURING IN 1979.(PHOTO).

MUSICIAN HARRY-SONG,REVEALS THE FACE OF THE FEMALE FAN WHO IS THREATENING TO KILL HIM.{PHOTOS}.

THE NEW OONI OF ILE-IFE,WILL NOT EAT THE HEART OF THE LATE OONI-PALACE CHIEFS.