WHY OBI LOST AT TRIBUNAL BUT WON ANAMBRA CASE- CHEKWAS OKORIE. (PHOTO).

 

Why Obi Lost At Tribunal But Won Anambra Case – Chekwas Okorie

 

Following the ruling of the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT), the presidential candidate of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), Chief Chekwas Okorie has bored his thoughts on why Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) experienced defeat in the tribunal judgment, despite he emerged victorious in his gubernatorial court case in Anambra.

The presidential candidate of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) in the 2023 elections, has expressed his perspective on why Peter Obi, his counterpart from the Labour Party (LP), experienced defeat in the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal but emerged victorious in his gubernatorial court case in Anambra.

Okorie who spoke on Saturday explained that Obi’s success in his 2003 Anambra court case was attributed to the fact that APGA had representatives in every polling unit within Anambra State.

Sunday Telegraph recalls that Obi had contested in the 2003 Anambra gubernatorial elections under APGA and lost to the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Chris Ngige.

Obi, however, pursued the case in court and was later declared the winner of the election which he later served as the Governor of the state for 8 years.

Sharing his thoughts on the recent PEPT verdict, Okorie said there is no legislation mandating the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to transmit election results electronically.

He advised other political parties to ensure that they have ‘agents accredited by INEC to monitor the election at every polling unit, collect the form EC8A and diligently follow the results to the collation centre and report to their principals.’

Okorie stated that before the PEPT gave their judgment he had said that the petitioners did not have enough evidence.

He explained that Obi was able to secure his victory in 2003 because APGA had result sheets.

According to him, “One lesson political parties and their candidates must have learned from the recent judgment of the Appeal Court on Peter Obi and Atiku petitions is that INEC is not compelled by law to transmit results even when they have promised to do so.

“Failure to do so will not make them liable for any breach of the law. So, until the Electoral Law is amended, which is one of the challenges of the National Assembly, INEC is not under obligation to transmit results.

“What I will advise political parties to do is to ensure that they have agents accredited by INEC to monitor the election at every polling unit, collect the form EC8A and diligently follow the results to the collation centre and report to their principals.

“In 2003, when I was the National Chairman and founder of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), we made sure we had our agents in all the polling units in Anambra State.

“The result showed that Peter Obi won that election, but the PDP went somewhere to write a different result which was declared authentic by the INEC and Chris Ngige as the winner.

However, it was easy to detect that APGA result sheets were authentic because we had our agents in all the polling units.

“That was how Peter was able to win the case at the tribunal. In spite of the fact that the people who contested the election with us had far larger war chess in terms of money than our candidate, the tribunal had no choice but to give judgment to the rightful winner.

“I had said it earlier before the Appeal Court gave the recent judgment that other parties didn’t have enough evidence to prove that they won the election. One of them didn’t even have agents in certain locations.

“It is the form EC8A that is superior to results on the IreV portal. So, they lost from the beginning.”