SA'S ZUMA TO KNOW PRESIDENTIAL BID FATE ON MONDAY.(PHOTO).

Image
SA's Zuma to know presidential bid fate on Monday South Africa's former President Jacob Zuma will know the fate of his presidential bid on Monday, when the constitutional court will give its verdict. South Africa's former President Jacob Zuma will know the fate of his presidential bid on Monday, May 20. The country's constitutional court said in a statement on Sunday that it will rule on whether Zuma's conviction for contempt of court in June 2021 "disqualifies" him from "standing as a candidate for the National Assembly." For a candidate to qualify for the presidential seat in South Africa, they must be eligible to serve as a member of parliament. Zuma was slapped with a 15-month jail sentence for refusing to give evidence to a commission investigating corruption allegations against him during his rule as president from 2009 to 2018.  

PRICE HIKE: LAWYER ASKS TRIBUNAL TO JAIL MULTI-CHOICE MANAGER. (PHOTO).


 Price hike: Lawyer asks tribunal to jail MultiChoice manager


An Abuja-based lawyer, Festus Onifade, who dragged MultiChoice before the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal, Abuja, has commenced contempt proceedings against the Pay-TV company.


Onifade instituted contempt charges against the Manager of Abuja office of MultiChoice Nigeria Ltd, Mr Mohammed Sani, over alleged disobedience to court order.


In a Notice of Consequence of Disobedience to Order of Court, Form 48, marked CCPT/OP/02/2024 and filed on May 7,  Sani accused the MultiChoice MD of spunning the tribunal order restraining the firm from hiking its tariffs.


“Take notice that unless you obey the underlisted order of the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal, Abuja, given on the 29th day of April, 2024, you will be guilty of contempt of this tribunal and will be committed to prison,” the Form 48 read.


According to the lawyer, the said  April 29 order  restrained “the 1st defendant/respondent either by itself, agents, representatives, officers or privies, howsoever described from carrying out the impending increase in tariffs and cost of its products and services intended to take effect from 1st May, 2024, until the hearing and determination of the motion on notice already filed before this tribunal.”


The lawyer said despite the order which was validly served on MultiChoice on April 29, the firm deliberately neglected the order and wilfully increased the tariffs of its products and services on May 1.


He alleged that the company had a history of disobeying court/tribunal orders.


In the affidavit attached to the application, Onifade detailed how the company had been disobedient to court orders.


He contended that despite the service and receipt of the order, the company, flagrantly and wilfully disobeyed the order and went ahead without recourse to the plight of customers and increased the tariffs of its services and products on May 1.


Onifade said the firm filed a motion before the tribunal dated April 29 but filed April 30, claiming that the matter before the court is res judicata and completed act.


According to him, the non-compliance with the order of the tribunal granted on the 29th April 2024 is deliberate and an affront to the jurisdiction of this tribunal and has brought untold hardship to the claimant.


When the matter was called on Tuesday, Onifade told the tribunal that the matter was slated for hearing of his motion on notice.


However, counsel for MultiChoice, Moyosore Onigbanjo (SAN), said he filed an application on April 30 challenging the jurisdiction of the tribunal to make the order it made on April 29.


Besides, the senior lawyer said he also filed a memorandum of conditional appearance on same date.


He argued that where the jurisdcition of the court was challenged, the issue had to be decided before proceeding on other matters.


Lawyer to the FCCPC (2nd defendant), M. Adeke, said though he had been served with the processes in the matter, he wanted an adjournment to enable the commission to respond to all the applications served on it.


Onigbanjo equally sought an adjournment to enable him to respond to fresh processes served on him by Onifade.


Onifade did not oppose the application for adjournment and the tribunal, presided over by Thomas Okosun, adjourned the matter until May 16 for hearing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ACTOR BABA IJESHA APPEALS FIVE-YEAR JAIL SENTENCE FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT. (PHOTO).

INNOSON GIVES OUT BRAND NEW IVM G5 AND SALARY FOR LIFE TO THE MAN WHO PROPHESIED ABOUT HIS VEHICLE MANUFACTURING IN 1979.(PHOTO).

PUNISH MY ABUSERS WITHIN 48 HOURS OR FACE LAWSUIT- STUDENT BULLIED BY HER CLASSMATES THREATEN SCHOOL AUTHORITIES. (PHOTO).