ALLEGED $1.5M FRAUD: WITNESS TELLS COURT FUNDS CAME INTO DEFENDANT’S ACCOUNT IN MULTIPLE TRANCHES. (PHOTO). #PRESS RELEASE

Image
 Alleged $1.5m Fraud:   Witness Tells Court Funds Came into Defendant’s Account in Multiple Tranches The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Monday, June 29, 2026, presented its third prosecution witness (PW3), Levi Amanda Opice, a Compliance Officer with Guaranty Trust Bank (GTBank), in the ongoing trial of Ifoma Immanuel before Justice Mojisola Dada of the Lagos State Special Offences Court, Ikeja, over an alleged $1.5 million fraud. Immanuel is standing trial alongside his company, Intermediate Investment Holdings Limited, on a two-count charge bordering on obtaining money by false pretence and forgery involving the sum of $1.5 million. According to the EFCC, investigations revealed that the defendant allegedly induced Adebisi Adebutu of R28 Holdings Limited to invest $1.5 million by claiming that the funds would be used to finance projects linked to Chappal Petroleum Development Company Limited, Intermediate Investment Holdings Limited, and Chappal Ener...

TEXAS SUPREME COURT PERMITS JUDGES TO DECLINE OFFICIATING SAME-SEX MARRIAGES. (PHOTO).


 Texas Supreme Court permits judges to decline officiating same-sex marriages

AUSTIN, TEXAS - Texas judges and justices of the peace who perform weddings can now legally refuse to officiate ceremonies based on a “sincerely held religious belief” without facing disciplinary action, according to a new interpretation of the Judicial Code of Conduct from the Texas Supreme Court. The court issued the clarification on Oct. 24, stating, “It is not a violation of these canons for a judge to publicly refrain from performing a wedding ceremony based upon a sincerely held religious belief.”

The update came after a federal appeals court sought guidance from the Texas Supreme Court on state law earlier this year. The inquiry stemmed from a lawsuit filed by Jack County Judge Brian Umphress, who argued that being required to officiate same-sex marriages would violate his First Amendment rights. While the state court did not formally answer the federal court’s question, the new code comment effectively resolves the issue raised in Umphress’ case. Constitutional law experts, however, warn that the ruling’s broad language could allow judges to refuse other weddings, including interracial marriages. Critics, including LGBTQ advocates, argue the decision entrenches discrimination and raises potential conflicts with federal equal protection guarantees. The Texas ACLU said it is monitoring the situation closely.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SHAKIRA COVERS WOMEN'S HEALTH MAGAZINE,APRIL ISSUE.

INNOSON GIVES OUT BRAND NEW IVM G5 AND SALARY FOR LIFE TO THE MAN WHO PROPHESIED ABOUT HIS VEHICLE MANUFACTURING IN 1979.(PHOTO).

THE NEW OONI OF ILE-IFE,WILL NOT EAT THE HEART OF THE LATE OONI-PALACE CHIEFS.