MARILYN MANSON'S SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE BY FORMER ASSISTANT REINSTATED UNDER NEW CALIFORNIA LAW. (PHOTO)

Image
Marilyn Manson's sexual assault case by former assistant reinstated under new California law A previously dismissed sexual assault case against Marilyn Manson, filed by former assistant Ashley Walters, was revived Monday in Los Angeles Superior Court under a new California law extending the statute of limitations for certain sexual abuse claims. Judge Steve Cochran granted Walters’ motion for reconsideration, vacating his December 2025 ruling that had dismissed the case and allowing it to proceed toward trial. The original suit, first filed in 2021, accused Manson, whose legal name is Brian Warner, of sexual harassment, sexual battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and wrongful termination based on her time working for him in 2010–2011. Previous attempts to move the case forward were blocked because the claims were made years after the alleged incidents, with courts initially ruling that the delayed discovery doctrine did not apply. The new law, Assembly Bill 250, s...

MORE EXHIBITS ADMITTED AGAINST EX-PLATEAU GOV. JANG,IN AN ALLEGED N6.2BN FRAUD CASE.{PHOTO}.#PRESS RELEASE.

Image result for ex-gov. jang
      More documents presented by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, have been admitted by Justice Daniel Longji of a Plateau State High Court, sitting in Jos, in the ongoing trial of a former governor of the state, Jonah Jang.
Jang is being prosecuted alongside Yusuf Gyang Pam for an alleged N6.2 billion fraud perpetrated during his tenure.
At the last sitting on June 27, 2019 prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Jacobs, SAN, during the examination-in-chief of the tenth prosecution witness, PW10, Gomwalk Kechime, had sought to tender four letters from FCMB, Jos where the witness worked as a Branch Manager.
But counsel for Jang, Mike Ozekhome, SAN, raised objections to their admissibility, relying on Sections 89, 90 and 258 of the Evidence Act.
Jacobs had however, countered his argument, stressing that the documents passed the test of Section 84 of the Evidence Act. He further cited the case of Sylva v. Dickson, Olley v. Tunji, Daudu v. FRN amongst in support of his argument.
At the resumed sitting on July 10, 2019, Justice Longji, while delivering ruling, held that “the statements of account pass the admissibility test under Section 84 of the Evidence Act”, and so admitted them, accordingly.
The trial judge, however, ruled that the letters of loan sought to be tendered by the prosecution were photocopies, noting that only the originals can be admitted by the court.
Consequently, the Court admitted the account opening package and statement of account, while leaving out the loan facility letters.
Longji, thereafter, adjourned the case to July 23 and 24, 2019 for continuation of trial.
Image result for ex-gov. jang

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SHAKIRA COVERS WOMEN'S HEALTH MAGAZINE,APRIL ISSUE.

INNOSON GIVES OUT BRAND NEW IVM G5 AND SALARY FOR LIFE TO THE MAN WHO PROPHESIED ABOUT HIS VEHICLE MANUFACTURING IN 1979.(PHOTO).

TINUBU ANNOUNCES ARRIVAL OF 4 U.S ATTACK HELICOPTERS. (PHOTO).