TEXAS MAN ARRESTED WITH 75 POUNDS OF MARIJUANA IN LUGGAGE WHILE FLYING TO LONDON, POLICE SAY. (PHOTO).

Image
 Texas man arrested with 75 pounds of marijuana in luggage while flying to London, police say A Texas man was arrested at Miami International Airport after authorities found 75 pounds of marijuana in his luggage before he could board a flight to London. Harrison O’Neill Tiernan, 23, from Austin, was charged with cannabis trafficking. He was traveling to Heathrow Airport and had checked two suitcases for his British Airways flight. Inspectors discovered 65 vacuum-sealed packages containing a green, leafy substance later confirmed to be marijuana. U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers stopped Tiernan while he attempted to board the flight, and he acknowledged that the bags were his. Authorities noted the inspections were part of broader efforts at the airport due to high outbound narcotics activity. In total, Tiernan was carrying 34.01 kilograms, or 74.98 pounds, of marijuana. Homeland Security initially declined the case because the amount did not meet the federal threshold, a...

CLARIFICATION ON LEGALITY OF LAGOS STATE VEHICLE INSPECTION SERVICE (VIS) OFFICERS ON LAGOS ROADS VIS-A-VIS JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, ABUJA DIVISION ON POWER OF VIO ON ROADS IN FCT ABUJA.(PHOTO). #PRESS RELEASE.


 CLARIFICATION ON LEGALITY OF LAGOS STATE VEHICLE INSPECTION SERVICE (VIS) OFFICERS ON LAGOS ROADS VIS-A-VIS JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, ABUJA DIVISION ON POWER OF VIO ON ROADS IN FCT ABUJA


The attention of the Lagos State Ministry of Justice has been drawn to a viral report of misrepresentation of the Judgment of the Court of Appeal, Abuja Division which affirmed the judgment of the Federal High Court Abuja on the illegality of VIO activities of impounding or confiscating vehicles and/or imposing fines on motorists in FCT Abuja.


It would be recalled that sometime last year 2025, Justice Evelyn Maha of the Federal High Court had in a judgment in a fundamental rights enforcement suit held that the Respondents in the case which included the Director of Road Transport; the Team Leader, the Area Commander Jabi; as well as the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) are not empowered by any law or statute to stop, impound or confiscate vehicles and/or impose fines on motorists. 


The Judge therefore issued an order restraining the VIO from impounding or confiscating vehicles of motorists and or imposing fines on drivers.


It is important to understand that the Honourable Judge of the FHC and Justices of the Court of Appeal premised their decision on the absence of statutory power conferred on the Respondents (Appellants in the Court of Appeal) to stop, impound or confiscate vehicles and/or impose fines on motorists on roads in FCT Abuja.


The Lagos State Government acknowledged that the said Courts’ judgments and the restraining orders made are valid in law and binding, but wishes to make the following clarification for the benefit of the public particularly in Lagos State.


a. The Judgment though binding is not of general application or of nationwide effect in Nigeria.


b. That only parties to the suit and any State that has no statute on VIO like FCT Abuja are bound by the judgments.


c. Nigeria operates a federal system of government with clear legislative powers donated by the Constitution to the Federal and State Governments.


d. Vehicle inspections and traffic management are part of the Residual subjects for State governments


Unlike the FCT Abuja, Lagos State has a Statute on VIO in the Lagos State Transport Sector Reform Law. Section 12(1) of the law vests The STATE VEHICLE INSPECTION SERVICE (VIS) with the powers among others of:


(a) inspecting, regulating and ensuring the roadworthiness of motor vehicles in the State;


(b) pre-registration inspection of vehicles;


(c) inspection and issuance of Road Worthiness Certificate (RWC) in respect of all vehicles;


(d) cooperating with other agencies to enforce traffic rules and regulations;


Section 23(1) of the same law prescribed a ticket for fines payable by offenders under the law. The fine shall be paid either on the spot if it is imposed by a mobile court or within 48 hours upon issuance of the ticket by an authorised officer. On default of payment, a formal charge shall be proffered against the offender in the Magistrate Court or Mobile Court and he/she shall be allowed to defend himself. The suspect/offender is also at liberty to challenge the validity of the ticket in a court of law.


The process and procedure of the enforcement of the power of the VIS officers on Lagos roads are in accordance with the law and not unlawful or unconstitutional. 


Members of the public are therefore advised not to be misled by the misrepresentation of the judgments of both the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal and to cooperate with Lagos State VIS officers on Lagos roads to avoid sanctions with its attendance consequences. 


The Lagos State Government will continue to ensure that all transport and traffic enforcement activities on Lagos roads are conducted strictly in accordance with the Laws and Regulations, with civility, decorum and respect to road users. Therefore, any motorist on Lagos roads who disobeys or assaults a VIS officer in Lagos State in the course of performance of his statutory duty will be subject to arrest and prosecution by this Ministry.


Mr. Lawal Pedro (SAN)


Honourable Attorney-General and


Commissioner for Justice, 


Lagos State.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INNOSON GIVES OUT BRAND NEW IVM G5 AND SALARY FOR LIFE TO THE MAN WHO PROPHESIED ABOUT HIS VEHICLE MANUFACTURING IN 1979.(PHOTO).

SHAKIRA COVERS WOMEN'S HEALTH MAGAZINE,APRIL ISSUE.

AMBODE,SOYINKA & OTHERS AT THE OFFICIAL LAUNCH OF LAGOS AT 50 YEARS ANNIVERSARY AGAINST 2017.{PHOTOS}.