NDC STATEMENT ON COURT RULING. (PHOTO). #PRESS RELEASE.

Image
 NDC STATEMENT ON COURT RULING Our attention has been drawn to a ruling by the Federal High Court sitting in Lokoja this morning, wherein His Lordship, Honourable Justice Isah Dashen, gave a ruling on an application filed by an unregistered association known as Peace Movement Party. The public knows that by December 2025, the Nigeria Democratic Congress  as an association complained of INEC’s refusal to register us as a political party, whereupon we proceeded to the Federal High Court. The Federal High Court upheld our constitutional right to freedom of association under the Constitution and compelled INEC to register us, which INEC did. Since then, we have started political activities, embarked on the registration of members, held congresses from ward to national levels, held conventions, and concluded primaries to all offices following INEC’s timetable. We have been fully participating in all INEC activities without let or hindrance. NDC also fielded candidates, and fully pa...

TRUMP CALLS FOR NATIONWIDE BAN ON MEDICAL TREATMENTS FOR TRANSGENDER YOUTH (PHOTO).


 Trump calls for nationwide ban on medical treatments for transgender youth

The Trump administration is preparing new federal rules that would sharply restrict gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth across the United States. Under the proposals being drafted by the Department of Health and Human Services, federal Medicaid and CHIP funding would no longer reimburse for medical treatments provided to transgender patients under the age of 18 or 19. An even broader measure would cut off all Medicaid and Medicare funding to hospitals that provide gender-affirming care for minors, effectively pressuring medical facilities nationwide to end such services if they wish to continue participating in federal healthcare programs.

If enacted, the new regulations would make it nearly impossible for young transgender patients to access medical care supported by public health insurance, building on existing state-level bans already in place in more than two dozen states. The proposals follow President Trump’s earlier executive order declaring that the federal government would not support the “transition” of minors and align with the administration’s broader campaign to limit transgender rights in healthcare, education, and the military. Over the past year, federal agencies have withdrawn research funding related to LGBTQ health, disbanded suicide prevention programs tailored to transgender youth, and launched investigations into hospitals offering gender-affirming treatments.

Health policy experts warn that conditioning hospital participation in Medicaid and Medicare on ending gender-affirming care represents an unprecedented expansion of executive authority. Because most hospitals depend heavily on Medicare funding, this move would effectively eliminate youth gender-care programs across the country — regardless of whether patients use public or private insurance. Critics also question the legality of such a rule, warning that it could set a dangerous precedent, allowing any administration to cut off federal funding based on disapproval of certain medical practices. Legal scholars anticipate that, if finalized, the rules would face extensive court challenges over constitutional and administrative law violations.

The administration’s focus on transgender issues extends beyond health regulations. Federal agencies have linked unrelated policy disputes — such as food assistance programs and university funding — to opposition against transgender rights. Transgender service members have been forced out of the military, and colleges have been pressured to adopt restrictive policies on campus gender access. Advocates say these combined efforts have already caused widespread fear and the closure of clinics that still legally provide care.

Although gender-affirming care for minors remains legal under federal law and continues to be supported by major U.S. medical organizations, access is rapidly shrinking. Treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy are endorsed as safe and medically appropriate by professional associations, but political and financial pressures have made them increasingly unavailable. Researchers in Utah recently reaffirmed the safety and benefits of this care, concluding that bans cannot be justified by medical evidence. The upcoming release of the Trump administration’s proposed rules is expected to ignite significant public debate and prompt legal challenges that could determine the future of transgender healthcare access in the United States.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SHAKIRA COVERS WOMEN'S HEALTH MAGAZINE,APRIL ISSUE.

THE NEW OONI OF ILE-IFE,WILL NOT EAT THE HEART OF THE LATE OONI-PALACE CHIEFS.

INNOSON GIVES OUT BRAND NEW IVM G5 AND SALARY FOR LIFE TO THE MAN WHO PROPHESIED ABOUT HIS VEHICLE MANUFACTURING IN 1979.(PHOTO).