DUTCH REFEREE ROB DIEPERINK DIES WEEKS AFTER REMOVAL FROM WORLD CUP OFFICIATING LIST. (PHOTO).
Dutch referee Rob Dieperink dies weeks after removal from World Cup officiating list Dutch referee Rob Dieperink has died at the age of 38, weeks after FIFA removed him from its list of officials for the World Cup. The Dutch Football Association (KNVB) confirmed his death in a statement, saying it was “shocked and deeply saddened” by the news. His cause of death has not been disclosed. Dieperink was arrested in April by the Metropolitan Police in the United Kingdom following a report of an alleged sexual assault involving a teenage boy in London. A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said officers responded on April 9 to a report of sexual assault at an address in Croydon and arrested a man in his 30s on suspicion of the offence. Police later said that after reviewing available evidence, including CCTV footage and digital devices, the investigation had concluded that “the evidential threshold had not been met” and no further action would be taken. Following the investigation, FIFA co...
The case of conspiracy,stealing,abuse of office and obtaining under false pretence filed against the trio of Senator Adeseye Ogunlewe,Pro Chancellor,Federal University of Agriculture,Abeokuta,FUNNAB,the Vice Chancellor,Prof. Olusola Oyewole and the Bursar,Moses Olusola Ilesanmi did not hold on the 16th of December,because the presiding judge,Justice O.O. Majekodunmi was bereaved.At the resumed hearing today,19th December,counsel to the first defendant,Wale Adesokan {SAN} approached the court through a motion on notice filed and served on the prosecuting counsel on the 15th of December,to quash the charges against the 1st defendant,Senator Adeseye Ogunlewe on the ground of lack of jurisdiction,information is bad for duplicity,misjoinder,lack of evidence and contradictory in terms.And for that reason the court should strike out the name of Senator Adeseye Ogunlewe,since the proof of evidence did not disclose any offence against him.The motion served on the prosecuting counsel earlier was responded to accordingly by the prosecuting counsel stating that the EFCC received a petition dated 19th July this year from three stakeholders of the Federal University of Agriculture,Abeokuta complaining about the criminal conduct of the 1st accused and his co-accused persons in the running of the affairs of the said University.That when the 1st accused was invited in respect of the said allegation,and he volunteered his statement in response to the petition.And that a careful perusal of his statement as contained in the proof of evidence,shows the level of his culpability and direct link and positive to the information against him.The contrary to the the motion on notice the information pending before the court is not bad for alleged duplicity,neither are they ambiguos.The said count does not offend the rules off drafting as regards joinder of parties in a charge,as they are certain and not contradictory.The matter was adjourned to 7th January,next year for the hearing of application and commencement of trial while 9th and 10th are for continuation of trial.
Comments
Post a Comment